Note: This chart does not preclude assigning forms of upper-division work in lower-division classes, where appropriate.
| Course Level | Assigned Reading | Classroom Activities | Writing Assignments and Skills | Critical Thinking in Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 & 200 level | - completing chapter-length textbook readings, secondary source articles and book chapters, and frequent source document readings
- learning basic historical chronologies - reading and utilizing digital materials, to include online source materials and CD resources |
- note taking in lectures
- contributing to class discussions - contributing to group discussions - participating in debates - group/partner work |
- reading/film responses
- reading summaries - source document analysis - brief position papers - learning how to quote a source, primary or secondary - learning basic editing and formatting guidelines |
- learning to select appropriate topics
- conducting basic research - learning to recognize the difference between primary and secondary sources and beginning to think critically about both - beginning to formulate a thesis or claim - beginning to spot historical trends or parallels - beginning to recognize authors' claims and arguments |
| History 250 | - any of the above
- reading archival materials, microfilm, news periodicals, and complete monographs |
- any of the above
- writing exercises - library research - archival research - introduction to oral history as a primary source |
- any of the above
- primary research reports - documentary and secondary source analysis - archival source reports - a major research essay - learning to quote and cite sources, correctly and consistently - graduating to quoting mainly primary source material, rather than secondary source authors - learning to format and edit historical writing correctly and consistently - learning to manage multiple deadlines - learning how to assess the work of another historian and/or a classmate in the form of book/article reviews, feedback on drafts |
- learning to write comparative source analyses
- learning to formulate a thesis or claim - learning to spot historical trends or parallels - learning to reconcile or synthesize varying or discrepant data, claims, or evidence - leaning to support claims with evidence - learning to identify poor or conflicting evidence - learning to identify bogus claims and faulty reasoning - introduction to/development of the ability to recognize and assess historical interpretation |
| 300-400 level | - any of the above | - any of the above
- group or individual presentations - making/ presenting slides - engaging with community sources, archives, museums - conducting original interviews |
- any of the above
- writing comparative papers across differing fields, eras, regions, etc. - coming to master written format: structure, quoting sources, editing, citations, notes, and bibliographies - writing often and meeting multiple deadlines |
- coming to master the above
- formulating more sophisticated responses to source documents or works of scholarship - expressing complex ideas orally and in writing - learning to build complex arguments supported by various sources |
| History 350 | - any of the above | - any of the above
- participating in a simulation of a professional conference: |
- any of the above
- a major historiography paper |
- recognizing and articulating the difference between history as "sum total" of past events vs. history as the created, written record of the past
- understanding that the discipline of history has a history of its own - recognizing and identifying various schools of historical thought and interpretation - understanding that written history and historical interpretations are conditioned by the cultural context in which they originate - understanding history as a profession and learning about opportunities for practice of that profession |